Upwork · AI Engineers

Upwork Proposal Generator for AI Engineers

Paste the job post. Get a proposal that sounds like a senior AI engineer wrote it — not ChatGPT. In 30 seconds.

Generate your first proposal free

3 free proposals/month · No credit card

The Problem

Why AI engineer proposals get ignored on Upwork

One ATS score to rule them all

Workday, Greenhouse, Taleo, and iCIMS parse resumes differently. Engineers who chase a single 90% number ship tooling that games one parser and fails the rest — clients spot the gap fast.

Keyword stuffing flagged as gaming

Claude can swap in JD terms, but stuffing skills the candidate doesn't have gets flagged. AI engineers who don't map honest skill vocabulary to parser logic build resume tools that hurt applicants.

Formatting parsers can't read

Tailored content means nothing if the export breaks section structure. Posts want ATS-safe output; devs who stop at LLM rewrites inherit support tickets about invisible resumes.

Example

Real job post → Bidly proposal

Client job post

Title: AI Engineer — ATS Resume Tailoring + Scoring Engine

Build a resume tailoring tool: parse job description, extract required skills via Claude, rewrite resume sections to match honestly (flag unsupported claims), score against real ATS logic (keyword match, structure, readability), export ATS-safe formats.

Stack: Node.js, React, Claude API. Target: 90%+ score but defensible across multiple parsers (Workday, Greenhouse, Taleo).

Budget: $5,000–$8,000. Timeline: 8 weeks. Share AI systems that turn messy criteria into scored output.

Bidly proposal

Chasing a 90 percent ATS score is where most of these builds quietly break. The scanners you're targeting (Workday, Greenhouse, Taleo, iCIMS) each parse resumes differently, so a resume that scores 90 in one parser can drop to 60 in another. The real engineering problem isn't getting Claude to swap in keywords, it's mapping the job description to the right skill vocabulary without stuffing terms that get a candidate flagged as gaming the system, and keeping formatting the parser can actually read.

I build AI systems on exactly this stack. Two that are close to your problem:

PerfectMatchSchools (perfectmatchschools.com): a live ATS-style platform I built solo where teachers get matched to schools through a scoring algorithm. Before, matching was manual and vague; after, applicants got ranked fits automatically. Same core discipline your resume-scoring engine needs: turning messy criteria into a defensible score.

Bidly (bidly.space): a live SaaS with paying users that reads a job post and generates targeted proposals through the Claude API in about 30 seconds. Same job-post-to-tailored-output pipeline your resume tailoring depends on.

How I'd approach it:
1. Build a parser layer that scores against the real ATS logic (keyword match, section structure, readability) rather than one generic number.
2. Use Claude to extract required skills from the job posting, then rewrite resume sections to match honestly, flagging any claim that isn't backed by the original resume.
3. Return the tailored resume plus a score breakdown so the user sees exactly why they hit or missed 90.
4. Ship it as a Node and React app with export to ATS-safe formats.

Are you tailoring against one specific ATS your applicants keep hitting, or does this need to score well across several different systems?

Names multi-parser ATS variance as the engineering trap, proves scoring pipelines with live matching and Claude SaaS, and ends with single vs. multi-ATS scoping question.

How It Works

From job post to winning proposal in 3 steps.

Step 1

Paste the job post

Drop in any Upwork, Fiverr, or freelancer job description.

Step 2

Bidly reads and thinks

Our AI analyzes what the client actually wants — not just what they wrote.

Step 3

Get a winning proposal

A personalized, send-ready proposal in your voice. In under 30 seconds.

Built For You

Built for ai engineers, not generic freelancers

Proposal Scoring

Every AI engineer proposal is scored on Hook, Specificity, Credibility, Clarity, and CTA — so you know it will land before you spend a Connect.

Niche-Aware Output

Bidly reads ai engineers job posts for the details clients care about — not generic freelancer filler that gets skipped in the first line.

Profile Optimizer

Paste your Upwork profile and get a rewritten version that ranks higher for ai engineers searches and converts views into interview invites.

Writes In Your Voice

Trained on your skills and experience as a AI engineer. Every proposal sounds like you wrote it — not a robot reading a template.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bidly free?+
Yes — Bidly gives every AI engineer 3 proposals per month on the free plan, no credit card required. Pro is $1.99/month for unlimited proposals plus Elite Framework mode.
Will clients know my proposal is AI-written?+
Bidly is engineered to sound human — niche-aware, no ChatGPT filler phrases, written in your voice as a AI engineer. That's the whole point of the product.
Does Bidly understand Claude API and LLM pipeline job posts?+
Yes. Bidly reads extraction, scoring, and structured-output requirements from the post and scopes proposals to parser design and honest tailoring — not generic 'AI expert' language.
How long should an AI engineer proposal be?+
200–280 words for systems builds. Bidly balances technical depth on scoring logic and guardrails with one clarifying question clients can answer in a reply.
Can Bidly avoid proposals that sound like raw ChatGPT?+
Core to Bidly. AI engineer proposals lead with the failure mode in the client's stack — parser variance, idempotency, JSON schemas — in a senior engineer voice.

Win your next Upwork job as a AI engineer.

Paste the job post. Get a proposal that sounds like you — in 30 seconds. 3 free proposals every month.

Generate your first proposal free